<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1029 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that Section 68 of the Income Tax Act requires an actual receipt of money during the relevant accounting year. As no amount was received from BJW in the year under consideration and the transaction occurred in the previous financial year, the addition made by the AO was deemed unjustified and was consequently deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1029 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that Section 68 of the Income Tax Act requires an actual receipt of money during the relevant accounting year. As no amount was received from BJW in the year under consideration and the transaction occurred in the previous financial year, the addition made by the AO was deemed unjustified and was consequently deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>