<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 991 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178057</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, confirming the block assessment order was barred by limitation due to the invalidity of the Panchnama dated 12th Feb., 1996. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to examine the search duration was validated, as was its consideration of material evidence. The determination that profit realization in land sale transactions occurs upon transaction completion was also upheld. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 991 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178057</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, confirming the block assessment order was barred by limitation due to the invalidity of the Panchnama dated 12th Feb., 1996. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to examine the search duration was validated, as was its consideration of material evidence. The determination that profit realization in land sale transactions occurs upon transaction completion was also upheld. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>