https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178054 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal concerning the invocation of s. 50C provisions on property sales in Jaipur. For the office premises in Kamal Complex, the Tribunal remanded the case to the AO for further examination, as possession and payment occurred before s. 50C's effective date. Regarding the plot in Dharm Park, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the Rs. 53,100 addition due to the absence of a registered sale deed. The Tribunal did not provide detailed findings on the interest charged under ss. 234B, 234D, and 244A. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178054 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal concerning the invocation of s. 50C provisions on property sales in Jaipur. For the office premises in Kamal Complex, the Tribunal remanded the case to the AO for further examination, as possession and payment occurred before s. 50C's effective date. Regarding the plot in Dharm Park, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the Rs. 53,100 addition due to the absence of a registered sale deed. The Tribunal did not provide detailed findings on the interest charged under ss. 234B, 234D, and 244A. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178054