<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 222 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletions and disallowances made by the ld. CIT (A) in the case. The Tribunal emphasized consistency with past decisions and noted that the transactions were business-related, not loans or advances. Detailed reasoning was provided for each issue, citing relevant case laws and past decisions to support the conclusions reached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 222 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletions and disallowances made by the ld. CIT (A) in the case. The Tribunal emphasized consistency with past decisions and noted that the transactions were business-related, not loans or advances. Detailed reasoning was provided for each issue, citing relevant case laws and past decisions to support the conclusions reached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>