<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1002 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178043</link>
    <description>The appeals for the assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05 were allowed due to the absence of incriminating materials. However, the appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08 were dismissed. The legality of the search, lack of opportunity, invocation of Sections 145(3) and 144, estimation of suppressed sales and profits, addition of unexplained investment in stock, and levy of interest were all upheld by the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1002 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178043</link>
      <description>The appeals for the assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05 were allowed due to the absence of incriminating materials. However, the appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08 were dismissed. The legality of the search, lack of opportunity, invocation of Sections 145(3) and 144, estimation of suppressed sales and profits, addition of unexplained investment in stock, and levy of interest were all upheld by the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>