<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (11) TMI 32 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178040</link>
    <description>Capital gains under section 12B accrued when a capital asset was sold and the assessee obtained an enforceable right to receive the sale price in the relevant accounting year; actual receipt of money was not required. The transfer of vehicles and route rights to another legal entity for an agreed price was treated as a sale, and the later agreement to accept shares or a reduced amount did not alter the year of taxability. Later non-recovery or variation in the mode of satisfaction could not defer or negate the accrual of profits in that year. The Madras HC therefore held the assessee liable to capital gains tax and answered the reference against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (11) TMI 32 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178040</link>
      <description>Capital gains under section 12B accrued when a capital asset was sold and the assessee obtained an enforceable right to receive the sale price in the relevant accounting year; actual receipt of money was not required. The transfer of vehicles and route rights to another legal entity for an agreed price was treated as a sale, and the later agreement to accept shares or a reduced amount did not alter the year of taxability. Later non-recovery or variation in the mode of satisfaction could not defer or negate the accrual of profits in that year. The Madras HC therefore held the assessee liable to capital gains tax and answered the reference against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>