<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1040 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) read with Explanation 5A, finding it justified as the additional income declared in response to the notice under Section 153A was not disclosed in the original return. The Tribunal also confirmed the recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for penalty initiation and dismissed the appeal, concluding that the penalty was valid and applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1040 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) read with Explanation 5A, finding it justified as the additional income declared in response to the notice under Section 153A was not disclosed in the original return. The Tribunal also confirmed the recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for penalty initiation and dismissed the appeal, concluding that the penalty was valid and applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>