<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1039 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178029</link>
    <description>No ground was found for interference with the impugned income tax judgment, so the Supreme Court declined to exercise special leave jurisdiction and dismissed the special leave petitions. The order records no substantive adjudication on the tax controversy and reflects only the Court&#039;s refusal to intervene.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1039 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178029</link>
      <description>No ground was found for interference with the impugned income tax judgment, so the Supreme Court declined to exercise special leave jurisdiction and dismissed the special leave petitions. The order records no substantive adjudication on the tax controversy and reflects only the Court&#039;s refusal to intervene.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>