<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1015 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found merit in the arguments regarding the retrospective application of the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, remanding three cases to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the proviso&#039;s applicability and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1015 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found merit in the arguments regarding the retrospective application of the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, remanding three cases to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the proviso&#039;s applicability and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>