<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 893 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 74,01,988/- for inflated and bogus purchases. The Tribunal found the purchases genuine and essential for the contract work, supported by thorough verification by MCGM. The net profit rate was deemed reasonable, aligning with industry standards. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was influenced by the Settlement Commission&#039;s stance in similar cases, ultimately upholding the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 893 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 74,01,988/- for inflated and bogus purchases. The Tribunal found the purchases genuine and essential for the contract work, supported by thorough verification by MCGM. The net profit rate was deemed reasonable, aligning with industry standards. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was influenced by the Settlement Commission&#039;s stance in similar cases, ultimately upholding the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>