<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 888 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271096</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD confirmed the demand for service tax in the case involving an Asset Licensing Agreement between M/s Dabur Research Foundation and another entity for Scientific and Technical Consultancy services. The judgment emphasized the need to determine whether the agreement constituted a &quot;transfer of the right to use goods&quot; for service tax purposes. The appellants argued for a stay of recovery, citing legal requirements and tribunal decisions. The judgment highlighted the distinction between possession and custody in assessing the transfer of rights and allowed a stay of recovery with a specified deposit deadline, considering VAT payment and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 888 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271096</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD confirmed the demand for service tax in the case involving an Asset Licensing Agreement between M/s Dabur Research Foundation and another entity for Scientific and Technical Consultancy services. The judgment emphasized the need to determine whether the agreement constituted a &quot;transfer of the right to use goods&quot; for service tax purposes. The appellants argued for a stay of recovery, citing legal requirements and tribunal decisions. The judgment highlighted the distinction between possession and custody in assessing the transfer of rights and allowed a stay of recovery with a specified deposit deadline, considering VAT payment and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>