<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 887 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271095</link>
    <description>Refund claims under Notification No. 41/2007-ST require documentary proof linking the tax-paid service to eligible export-related service and identifying the relevant quarter. A Port Services claim was rejected because the documents did not show the nature of service or the quarter to which the tax related. For GTA Services, strict lorry-receipt and shipping-bill matching was not treated as final where later relaxation under Notification No. 17/2009-ST and Circular No. 120/01/2010-ST allowed self-certification or chartered accountant certification to establish correlation. The GTA refund issue was therefore reopened for reconsideration on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 887 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271095</link>
      <description>Refund claims under Notification No. 41/2007-ST require documentary proof linking the tax-paid service to eligible export-related service and identifying the relevant quarter. A Port Services claim was rejected because the documents did not show the nature of service or the quarter to which the tax related. For GTA Services, strict lorry-receipt and shipping-bill matching was not treated as final where later relaxation under Notification No. 17/2009-ST and Circular No. 120/01/2010-ST allowed self-certification or chartered accountant certification to establish correlation. The GTA refund issue was therefore reopened for reconsideration on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>