<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 886 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant, a builder, for not discharging service tax liability on advance payments received for construction work. The appellant&#039;s challenge based on the timing of tax discharge was deemed unconvincing, and penalties were maintained. However, the Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s compliance with penalty payment requirements under the Finance Act, extending the deadline due to the tax amount threshold. Ultimately, the appeal was disposed of, recognizing the penalty payment as adequate adherence to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 886 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant, a builder, for not discharging service tax liability on advance payments received for construction work. The appellant&#039;s challenge based on the timing of tax discharge was deemed unconvincing, and penalties were maintained. However, the Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s compliance with penalty payment requirements under the Finance Act, extending the deadline due to the tax amount threshold. Ultimately, the appeal was disposed of, recognizing the penalty payment as adequate adherence to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>