<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 874 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit, finding the appellant guilty of multiple regulatory violations and involvement in smuggling activities. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of strict adherence to customs regulations and the accountability of CHA license holders for their and their employees&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 874 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit, finding the appellant guilty of multiple regulatory violations and involvement in smuggling activities. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of strict adherence to customs regulations and the accountability of CHA license holders for their and their employees&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>