<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 872 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271080</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was held maintainable despite an alternate appellate remedy because the dispute turned on a pure question of law, namely the meaning of &quot;for resale&quot;. The court held that deep-freezers and tricycles purchased outside the State and leased to distributors remained covered by the registration certificate, since transfer of the right to use goods is treated as a statutory sale under the sales tax regime and can satisfy the resale requirement for Form-C. It further held that a later amendment to the registration certificate operates prospectively and cannot defeat Form-C applications already pending when the amendment was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 872 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271080</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was held maintainable despite an alternate appellate remedy because the dispute turned on a pure question of law, namely the meaning of &quot;for resale&quot;. The court held that deep-freezers and tricycles purchased outside the State and leased to distributors remained covered by the registration certificate, since transfer of the right to use goods is treated as a statutory sale under the sales tax regime and can satisfy the resale requirement for Form-C. It further held that a later amendment to the registration certificate operates prospectively and cannot defeat Form-C applications already pending when the amendment was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>