https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271079 An administrative circular could not override the governing Government Resolution permitting reappointment of a regularly selected employee to his original cadre. The employee had been appointed on fixed pay, relieved to join another post, and sought return to the original post within a short period; refusal was based only on non-completion of five years' service, which was not a valid ground under the applicable policy. The High Court therefore treated the denial of reappointment as unjustified and held that the employee was entitled to be reappointed as Deputy Mamlatdar. The case reinforces that a circular cannot curtail benefits expressly available under the controlling policy. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:28:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271079 An administrative circular could not override the governing Government Resolution permitting reappointment of a regularly selected employee to his original cadre. The employee had been appointed on fixed pay, relieved to join another post, and sought return to the original post within a short period; refusal was based only on non-completion of five years' service, which was not a valid ground under the applicable policy. The High Court therefore treated the denial of reappointment as unjustified and held that the employee was entitled to be reappointed as Deputy Mamlatdar. The case reinforces that a circular cannot curtail benefits expressly available under the controlling policy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271079