<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 981 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178001</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order deleting the addition of unexplained share application money under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2005-2006 was dismissed. The ITAT upheld the deletion based on the share applicant&#039;s payment through cheques from its current account, following legal precedents that share application money cannot be treated as undisclosed income under section 68. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 981 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178001</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order deleting the addition of unexplained share application money under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2005-2006 was dismissed. The ITAT upheld the deletion based on the share applicant&#039;s payment through cheques from its current account, following legal precedents that share application money cannot be treated as undisclosed income under section 68. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>