<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that section 50C does not apply to transactions involving leasehold rights, setting aside the CIT(A) order based on stamp duty valuation. The decision emphasized the distinction between the transfer of leasehold rights and the land/building itself, ultimately favoring the assessee for the assessment year 2005-06.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that section 50C does not apply to transactions involving leasehold rights, setting aside the CIT(A) order based on stamp duty valuation. The decision emphasized the distinction between the transfer of leasehold rights and the land/building itself, ultimately favoring the assessee for the assessment year 2005-06.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>