https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177986 The appellant was successful in obtaining Cenvat credit for outdoor catering services after reversing the service tax amount paid for subsidized food. Input service credit for consultancy services was allowed based on a precedent. However, credit for life insurance and recruitment services was denied as the appellant voluntarily reversed the credit. The denial of Cenvat credit for tour and travel services was upheld, while credit for car repair services before April 1, 2011, was permitted due to lack of evidence of personal use. The appellant was also granted Cenvat credit for photography services used for business purposes, following a precedent set by the High Court. en-us Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:10:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177986 The appellant was successful in obtaining Cenvat credit for outdoor catering services after reversing the service tax amount paid for subsidized food. Input service credit for consultancy services was allowed based on a precedent. However, credit for life insurance and recruitment services was denied as the appellant voluntarily reversed the credit. The denial of Cenvat credit for tour and travel services was upheld, while credit for car repair services before April 1, 2011, was permitted due to lack of evidence of personal use. The appellant was also granted Cenvat credit for photography services used for business purposes, following a precedent set by the High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177986