<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 866 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling that the late fee imposition under Section 234E was not within the permissible scope of adjustments under Section 200A. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s grievance and deleted the late fees imposed, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 866 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling that the late fee imposition under Section 234E was not within the permissible scope of adjustments under Section 200A. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s grievance and deleted the late fees imposed, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>