<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 857 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds for loans to a sister concern, deemed to be for commercial expediency. The disallowance under section 14A of the Act was restored to the Assessing Officer for examination due to the absence of exempt income and procedural issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 857 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds for loans to a sister concern, deemed to be for commercial expediency. The disallowance under section 14A of the Act was restored to the Assessing Officer for examination due to the absence of exempt income and procedural issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>