<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing that indirect expenses common to both distribution and agency functions should be allocated based on gross margin rather than sales. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the Tribunal instructed the Transfer Pricing Officer to reallocate expenses accordingly. Other issues raised were deemed moot in light of this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing that indirect expenses common to both distribution and agency functions should be allocated based on gross margin rather than sales. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the Tribunal instructed the Transfer Pricing Officer to reallocate expenses accordingly. Other issues raised were deemed moot in light of this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>