https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271058 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands for services rendered outside Mumbai and for architect fees. However, it upheld the demands and penalties for 'Pouring Fees' and 'Signing Fees' within Mumbai jurisdiction. The Commissioner was directed to work out the quantum of service tax on 'Pouring Fees' and 'Signing Fees' within 15 days, while appropriate interest and penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act were deemed payable. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271058 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands for services rendered outside Mumbai and for architect fees. However, it upheld the demands and penalties for 'Pouring Fees' and 'Signing Fees' within Mumbai jurisdiction. The Commissioner was directed to work out the quantum of service tax on 'Pouring Fees' and 'Signing Fees' within 15 days, while appropriate interest and penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act were deemed payable. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271058