<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 840 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order imposing redemption fines and penalties on individuals associated with a trading company for alleged duty evasion and clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found the charges to be based on presumption and surmises, lacking tangible evidence. As the company was not penalized and the allegations were refuted with evidence of trade practices, the penalties on individuals were deemed unjustified. Consequently, the penalties on the individuals were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:04:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 840 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order imposing redemption fines and penalties on individuals associated with a trading company for alleged duty evasion and clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found the charges to be based on presumption and surmises, lacking tangible evidence. As the company was not penalized and the allegations were refuted with evidence of trade practices, the penalties on individuals were deemed unjustified. Consequently, the penalties on the individuals were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>