https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271047 The Tribunal found that the amounts received by the main appellant were for repairing and reconditioning old dies and machinery parts, not for manufacturing activities. Consequently, the demand for duty liability, interest, and penalties on both the main appellant and Shri Paul D'Souza was set aside. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief deemed necessary. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271047 The Tribunal found that the amounts received by the main appellant were for repairing and reconditioning old dies and machinery parts, not for manufacturing activities. Consequently, the demand for duty liability, interest, and penalties on both the main appellant and Shri Paul D'Souza was set aside. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief deemed necessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271047