https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities' demand for service tax and penalty. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit a specific amount within a timeframe for the appeal to proceed. The Tribunal classified the service as "Business Auxiliary Service," not "Recovery Agent's Service," as contended by the appellants. The appeal was remanded due to non-compliance with Section 35F and the impact of a change of address on the appeal process. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2032 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities' demand for service tax and penalty. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit a specific amount within a timeframe for the appeal to proceed. The Tribunal classified the service as "Business Auxiliary Service," not "Recovery Agent's Service," as contended by the appellants. The appeal was remanded due to non-compliance with Section 35F and the impact of a change of address on the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2032