<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 830 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271038</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the writ petition, rejecting the refund of tax but granting the release of the bank guarantee. The Assessing Officer was directed to complete assessment proceedings within six months, provided the petitioner cooperated. The judgment clarified the obligations regarding stock transfers, tax refunds, and bank guarantee renewals, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in taxation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 830 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271038</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the writ petition, rejecting the refund of tax but granting the release of the bank guarantee. The Assessing Officer was directed to complete assessment proceedings within six months, provided the petitioner cooperated. The judgment clarified the obligations regarding stock transfers, tax refunds, and bank guarantee renewals, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in taxation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>