<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 828 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that refunds arising from finalization of provisional assessments are subject to Section 27 of the Customs Act and the bar of unjust enrichment. The evidence provided was insufficient to prove that duty burden was not passed on to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 828 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that refunds arising from finalization of provisional assessments are subject to Section 27 of the Customs Act and the bar of unjust enrichment. The evidence provided was insufficient to prove that duty burden was not passed on to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>