<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1093 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177978</link>
    <description>Section 10B deduction was treated as available to a software development unit approved by the Software Technology Park authority, where the unit was otherwise a 100% export oriented undertaking and satisfied the remaining statutory requirements. Approval by that authority was regarded as sufficient for the purpose of the provision, and the incentive was construed liberally to advance its object rather than be defeated by a technical objection about the form of approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1093 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177978</link>
      <description>Section 10B deduction was treated as available to a software development unit approved by the Software Technology Park authority, where the unit was otherwise a 100% export oriented undertaking and satisfied the remaining statutory requirements. Approval by that authority was regarded as sufficient for the purpose of the provision, and the incentive was construed liberally to advance its object rather than be defeated by a technical objection about the form of approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>