https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177979 The approved Coastal Zone Management Plan for Tamil Nadu, 1996 governed CRZ identification unless validly modified, so the later demarcation exercise could not override it. On that plan, the Uppanar river crossing and its banks were not shown as part of CRZ-III, and no separate environmental clearance was required for laying the pipeline beneath that portion. The paragraph 2(ii) exception in the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 was construed purposively to cover transfer of hazardous substances in or through port areas, avoiding an unworkable result. On that construction, the environmental clearance and allied permission for the pipeline and marine terminal facility were sustained. en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Jun 2017 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177979 The approved Coastal Zone Management Plan for Tamil Nadu, 1996 governed CRZ identification unless validly modified, so the later demarcation exercise could not override it. On that plan, the Uppanar river crossing and its banks were not shown as part of CRZ-III, and no separate environmental clearance was required for laying the pipeline beneath that portion. The paragraph 2(ii) exception in the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 was construed purposively to cover transfer of hazardous substances in or through port areas, avoiding an unworkable result. On that construction, the environmental clearance and allied permission for the pipeline and marine terminal facility were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177979