<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1098 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177979</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal and writ petitions challenging the environmental clearances and permissions granted to Chemplast. The court held that the Uppanar river and its banks at the relevant location do not fall under CRZ III as per the 1996 Plan, and the transfer of VCM through pipelines is permissible under the 1991 Notification. The court validated all the permissions and clearances granted to Chemplast and rejected the alternative solutions suggested by the petitioners. The project, having been established with significant investment and already operational, was not to be interfered with in the interest of justice and public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1098 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177979</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal and writ petitions challenging the environmental clearances and permissions granted to Chemplast. The court held that the Uppanar river and its banks at the relevant location do not fall under CRZ III as per the 1996 Plan, and the transfer of VCM through pipelines is permissible under the 1991 Notification. The court validated all the permissions and clearances granted to Chemplast and rejected the alternative solutions suggested by the petitioners. The project, having been established with significant investment and already operational, was not to be interfered with in the interest of justice and public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>