<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 31 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2027</link>
    <description>The exemption claim under Notification No. 56/98-ST required fresh verification because the lower authorities had not examined the claim on merits. The Tribunal noted that the department relied mainly on income-tax returns, while the appellants asserted that those returns did not accurately reflect taxable receipts and that services were rendered to government-owned entities. As the actual services rendered and amounts received needed proper scrutiny, the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh examination with an opportunity to adduce acceptable evidence. The appeal was allowed only for that limited purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 31 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2027</link>
      <description>The exemption claim under Notification No. 56/98-ST required fresh verification because the lower authorities had not examined the claim on merits. The Tribunal noted that the department relied mainly on income-tax returns, while the appellants asserted that those returns did not accurately reflect taxable receipts and that services were rendered to government-owned entities. As the actual services rendered and amounts received needed proper scrutiny, the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh examination with an opportunity to adduce acceptable evidence. The appeal was allowed only for that limited purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>