<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 823 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271031</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that service tax was payable based on demand letters treated as invoices. The extended time period for demand was deemed valid, and the correct valuation method was upheld. The appellant could claim a refund if charges set by TDSAT were below Rs. 0.10 per SMS/MMS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 823 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271031</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that service tax was payable based on demand letters treated as invoices. The extended time period for demand was deemed valid, and the correct valuation method was upheld. The appellant could claim a refund if charges set by TDSAT were below Rs. 0.10 per SMS/MMS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>