<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 817 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271025</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held inadmissible on service tax paid on amounts recovered from employees for canteen services, though tax paid on any eligible service component could still be available in accordance with law. On limitation and penalty, the prevailing larger bench view during the relevant period supported availment of credit, so the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief negated suppression and wilful intent. The extended period of limitation was therefore not sustainable, and penalty was set aside, while the demand within normal limitation with interest was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 817 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271025</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held inadmissible on service tax paid on amounts recovered from employees for canteen services, though tax paid on any eligible service component could still be available in accordance with law. On limitation and penalty, the prevailing larger bench view during the relevant period supported availment of credit, so the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief negated suppression and wilful intent. The extended period of limitation was therefore not sustainable, and penalty was set aside, while the demand within normal limitation with interest was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>