<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 815 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271023</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal and the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal due to insufficient reasoning for impleading the writ petitioner. The application for impleadment was revived for fresh adjudication, guided by legal principles. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 815 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271023</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal and the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal due to insufficient reasoning for impleading the writ petitioner. The application for impleadment was revived for fresh adjudication, guided by legal principles. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>