<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 811 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271019</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the Income Tax Department&#039;s seizure of cash was lawful but emphasized the mandatory nature of statutory time limits for asset release. Due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to decide within the prescribed period, the court ordered the release of the seized cash to the petitioner with statutory interest, citing relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 811 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271019</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the Income Tax Department&#039;s seizure of cash was lawful but emphasized the mandatory nature of statutory time limits for asset release. Due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to decide within the prescribed period, the court ordered the release of the seized cash to the petitioner with statutory interest, citing relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>