<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 114 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2025</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, allowed the appeal and rejected the clubbing of clearances for SSI exemption between two firms as there was no evidence of commonality in management, control, or trade transactions. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of interconnected relations and separate operations of the firms, overturning the penalty imposed. The judgment highlighted the necessity of credible evidence in establishing relationships between entities for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 114 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2025</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, allowed the appeal and rejected the clubbing of clearances for SSI exemption between two firms as there was no evidence of commonality in management, control, or trade transactions. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of interconnected relations and separate operations of the firms, overturning the penalty imposed. The judgment highlighted the necessity of credible evidence in establishing relationships between entities for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>