<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 802 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment provided relief to the assessee on multiple fronts, emphasizing procedural fairness, the necessity of credible evidence for additions, and the non-conclusiveness of statements made under duress during search operations. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, while the appeals by the assessee were partly allowed for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 and fully allowed for AY 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 802 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment provided relief to the assessee on multiple fronts, emphasizing procedural fairness, the necessity of credible evidence for additions, and the non-conclusiveness of statements made under duress during search operations. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, while the appeals by the assessee were partly allowed for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 and fully allowed for AY 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>