<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 798 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Director of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment order under Section 263 as it had merged with the appellate orders of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. Additionally, the assessment order was not deemed erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Therefore, the Tribunal canceled the order passed under Section 263 and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, maintaining that the tax effect would remain unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:30:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 798 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Director of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment order under Section 263 as it had merged with the appellate orders of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. Additionally, the assessment order was not deemed erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Therefore, the Tribunal canceled the order passed under Section 263 and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, maintaining that the tax effect would remain unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>