<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found that the CIT&#039;s invocation of jurisdiction under section 263 was unjustified in all three issues raised, including the management incentive disallowance and the deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of prejudice to the Revenue and canceled the CIT&#039;s order dated 20.03.2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:34:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found that the CIT&#039;s invocation of jurisdiction under section 263 was unjustified in all three issues raised, including the management incentive disallowance and the deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of prejudice to the Revenue and canceled the CIT&#039;s order dated 20.03.2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>