https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177952 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's order directing the RTA to process the respondent's application for a permit on the Jaipur-Rohtak route in accordance with the law. The Court clarified the scope of the STA's authority under Section 44(3)(b), emphasizing its broader jurisdiction while also upholding the binding nature of State Government directions issued under Section 43(1). The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and government directives in the administration of transport permits. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:08:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177952 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's order directing the RTA to process the respondent's application for a permit on the Jaipur-Rohtak route in accordance with the law. The Court clarified the scope of the STA's authority under Section 44(3)(b), emphasizing its broader jurisdiction while also upholding the binding nature of State Government directions issued under Section 43(1). The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and government directives in the administration of transport permits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177952