<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 950 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), ruling in favor of the assessee in the case involving the disallowance of expenses claimed under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for the assessment year 2005-06. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the expenses in question were not claimed in the profit and loss account but were capitalized as preoperative expenses, making the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) not applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:01:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 950 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), ruling in favor of the assessee in the case involving the disallowance of expenses claimed under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for the assessment year 2005-06. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the expenses in question were not claimed in the profit and loss account but were capitalized as preoperative expenses, making the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) not applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>