<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 784 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177933</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the Tax Appeal, quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, and remanded the proceedings for fresh consideration. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was not supported by the facts on record as the revised return was filed after the Income Tax Department issued a notice under section 143(2) of the Act. Both parties were granted the opportunity to be heard in the fresh proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 784 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177933</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the Tax Appeal, quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, and remanded the proceedings for fresh consideration. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was not supported by the facts on record as the revised return was filed after the Income Tax Department issued a notice under section 143(2) of the Act. Both parties were granted the opportunity to be heard in the fresh proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>