<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 989 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177931</link>
    <description>The Department&#039;s counsel stated that the appeal was not being pressed, and the court recorded that endorsement. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was therefore dismissed as not pressed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 989 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177931</link>
      <description>The Department&#039;s counsel stated that the appeal was not being pressed, and the court recorded that endorsement. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was therefore dismissed as not pressed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>