<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177916</link>
    <description>The SC held that criminal proceedings against a Managing Director were invalid where the company was not made a party despite allegations being primarily against the company. The court found allegations against the Managing Director were vague and non-specific, while the complainant&#039;s statement reflected charges against the company itself. The SC ruled that when a company is not arraigned as an accused, no proceedings can be initiated against it, even under vicarious liability provisions. The HC&#039;s failure to quash the proceedings was deemed erroneous, and the SC set aside the order and quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177916</link>
      <description>The SC held that criminal proceedings against a Managing Director were invalid where the company was not made a party despite allegations being primarily against the company. The court found allegations against the Managing Director were vague and non-specific, while the complainant&#039;s statement reflected charges against the company itself. The SC ruled that when a company is not arraigned as an accused, no proceedings can be initiated against it, even under vicarious liability provisions. The HC&#039;s failure to quash the proceedings was deemed erroneous, and the SC set aside the order and quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>