<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 792 - THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271000</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the supply management service fees received by Cummins Limited, UK, do not qualify as &quot;Fees for Technical Services&quot; or &quot;royalties&quot; under the India-UK Double Tax Avoidance Agreement. As a result, the fees are not taxable in India as there is no Permanent Establishment, and CTIL is not obligated to withhold tax under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 792 - THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271000</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the supply management service fees received by Cummins Limited, UK, do not qualify as &quot;Fees for Technical Services&quot; or &quot;royalties&quot; under the India-UK Double Tax Avoidance Agreement. As a result, the fees are not taxable in India as there is no Permanent Establishment, and CTIL is not obligated to withhold tax under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>