<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 769 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270977</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the claiming of benefits under Notification No.12/2003-ST for goods not sold or reflected in invoices. The court upheld the order and ruled that the appellant cannot claim the benefit for goods not sold or invoiced, citing relevant judicial decisions. Additionally, the court found the appeal regarding the invocation of the extended period due to audit findings as not maintainable, following the precedent set in a previous case, and granted the appellant liberty to address concerns before the appropriate forum if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 769 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270977</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the claiming of benefits under Notification No.12/2003-ST for goods not sold or reflected in invoices. The court upheld the order and ruled that the appellant cannot claim the benefit for goods not sold or invoiced, citing relevant judicial decisions. Additionally, the court found the appeal regarding the invocation of the extended period due to audit findings as not maintainable, following the precedent set in a previous case, and granted the appellant liberty to address concerns before the appropriate forum if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>