https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177910 An acquisition for the Yamuna Expressway project, including the interchange and developed land parcels, was treated as part of an integrated public infrastructure scheme under a BOT model and not as an acquisition for a private company under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; the challenge on that ground failed. The Court also accepted that the State had sufficient material to invoke urgency, including the scale of the project, delay, and risk of encroachment, so dispensation of the Section 5A enquiry under Sections 17(1) and 17(4) was upheld. The notifications and High Court judgments were sustained. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177910 An acquisition for the Yamuna Expressway project, including the interchange and developed land parcels, was treated as part of an integrated public infrastructure scheme under a BOT model and not as an acquisition for a private company under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; the challenge on that ground failed. The Court also accepted that the State had sufficient material to invoke urgency, including the scale of the project, delay, and risk of encroachment, so dispensation of the Section 5A enquiry under Sections 17(1) and 17(4) was upheld. The notifications and High Court judgments were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177910