<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 588 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177904</link>
    <description>The Authority ruled that interest earned on deposits and certain other incomes do not qualify for deduction u/s 80-I due to lack of direct nexus with the industrial undertaking. Expenses allocated by Marketing and Corporate offices should be excluded from the profit &amp; loss account for deduction computation. Miscellaneous income deductions are subject to AO&#039;s reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 588 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177904</link>
      <description>The Authority ruled that interest earned on deposits and certain other incomes do not qualify for deduction u/s 80-I due to lack of direct nexus with the industrial undertaking. Expenses allocated by Marketing and Corporate offices should be excluded from the profit &amp; loss account for deduction computation. Miscellaneous income deductions are subject to AO&#039;s reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>