<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (12) TMI 86 - COURT OF APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177903</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Crown&#039;s appeal, affirming that the taxable value of the suit received by the taxpayer as a Christmas gift from his employer was lb5, reflecting its second-hand market value. The court held that the benefit to the taxpayer was the suit itself, not the employer&#039;s purchase cost of lb14 15s. Thus, the suit was a taxable advantage under Schedule E of the Income Tax Act, 1952, valued at what the taxpayer could have obtained by selling it immediately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (12) TMI 86 - COURT OF APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177903</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Crown&#039;s appeal, affirming that the taxable value of the suit received by the taxpayer as a Christmas gift from his employer was lb5, reflecting its second-hand market value. The court held that the benefit to the taxpayer was the suit itself, not the employer&#039;s purchase cost of lb14 15s. Thus, the suit was a taxable advantage under Schedule E of the Income Tax Act, 1952, valued at what the taxpayer could have obtained by selling it immediately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>