<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 25 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2005</link>
    <description>Affixing an additional label to imported dietary supplements already sold in retail packets does not constitute manufacture where the goods were marketable upon import. Chapter 21 treats labelling or relabelling and other treatment rendering a product marketable as distinct limbs. The marketability limb applies only where treatment makes goods ready for marketing, rather than improving their saleability at a subsequent sales stage. Since the additional label did not make the imported supplements marketable, it did not attract Central Excise duty under the deemed-manufacture provision. The impugned excise demand was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 25 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2005</link>
      <description>Affixing an additional label to imported dietary supplements already sold in retail packets does not constitute manufacture where the goods were marketable upon import. Chapter 21 treats labelling or relabelling and other treatment rendering a product marketable as distinct limbs. The marketability limb applies only where treatment makes goods ready for marketing, rather than improving their saleability at a subsequent sales stage. Since the additional label did not make the imported supplements marketable, it did not attract Central Excise duty under the deemed-manufacture provision. The impugned excise demand was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>